In solidarity with Reddit and other sites, this site is blacked out today (January 18th) in protest against SOPA and PROTECT IP laws. These laws are a threat to free speech and to the freedom of the Internet. Please contact your congressional representative and tell them to vote 'No' on this law.

What is so bad about SOPA and PROTECT IP?

Threat to online freedom of speech

According to the EFF, proxy servers, such as those used during the Arab Spring, can also be used to thwart copyright enforcement and therefore may be made illegal by the act.

On TIME's Techland blog, Jerry Brito wrote, "Imagine if the U.K. created a blacklist of American newspapers that its courts found violated celebrities' privacy? Or what if France blocked American sites it believed contained hate speech?" Similarly, the Center for Democracy and Technology warned, "If SOPA and PIPA are enacted, the US government must be prepared for other governments to follow suit, in service to whatever social policies they believe are important—whether restricting hate speech, insults to public officials, or political dissent."

Laurence H. Tribe, a Harvard University professor of constitutional law, released an open letter on the web stating that SOPA would “undermine the openness and free exchange of information at the heart of the Internet. And it would violate the First Amendment.”

The AFL-CIO's Paul Almeida, arguing in favor of SOPA, has stated that free speech was not a relevant consideration, because "The First Amendment does not protect stealing goods off trucks."

Negative impact on websites that host user content

Journalist Rebecca MacKinnon argued in an op-ed that making companies liable for users' actions could have a chilling effect on user-generated sites like YouTube. "The intention is not the same as China’s Great Firewall, a nationwide system of Web censorship, but the practical effect could be similar", she says.

The EFF has warned that Etsy, Flickr and Vimeo all seem likely to shut down if the bill becomes law. According to critics, the bill would ban linking to sites deemed offending, even in search results and on services such as Twitter.

Christian Dawson, COO of Virginia-based hosting company ServInt, predicted that the legislation would lead to many cloud computing and Web hosting services moving out of the US to avoid lawsuits.

Conversely, Michael O'Leary of the MPAA argued at the November 16 Judiciary Committee hearing that the act's effect on business would be more minimal, noting that at least 16 countries block websites, and the internet still functions in those countries. Denmark, Finland, Ireland and Italy blocked The Pirate Bay after courts ruled in favor of music and film industry litigation, and a coalition of film and record companies has threatened to sue British Telecom if it does not follow suit. Maria Pallante of the US Copyright Office said that Congress has updated the Copyright Act before and should again, or "the U.S. copyright system will ultimately fail." Asked for clarification, she said that the US currently lacks jurisdiction over websites in other countries.

Weakening of "safe harbor" protections for websites

The Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA), passed in 1998, includes a provision, known as the Online Copyright Infringement Liability Limitation Act, that provides a "safe harbor" for websites that host content. Under that provision, copyright owners who feel that a website is hosting content that infringes on their copyright are required to submit a notice to that website to ask for the infringing material to be removed, and the website is then given a certain amount of time to remove such material. SOPA would override this "safe harbor" provision, by allowing judges to immediately block access to any website found guilty of hosting copyrighted material.

According to critics of the bill such as the Center for Democracy and Technology and the Electronic Frontier Foundation, the bill's wording is vague enough that a single complaint about even a major website could be enough to cause the site to be blocked, with the burden of proof then resting on the website to get itself un-blocked. The focus of much of the criticism is on a statement in the bill, that any website would be blocked that "is taking, or has taken deliberate actions to avoid confirming a high probability of the use of the U.S.-directed site to carry out acts that constitute a violation." Critics have read this to mean that a website that does not actively monitor its content for copyright violations, but instead waits for others to notify it of such violations, could be guilty under the law.

Law professor Jason Mazzone wrote, "Damages are also not available to the site owner unless a claimant 'knowingly materially' misrepresented that the law covers the targeted site, a difficult legal test to meet. The owner of the site can issue a counter-notice to restore payment processing and advertising but services need not comply with the counter-notice".

Goodlatte stated, "We're open to working with them on language to narrow [the bill's provisions], but I think it is unrealistic to think we're going to continue to rely on the DMCA notice-and-takedown provision. Anybody who is involved in providing services on the Internet would be expected to do some things. But we are very open to tweaking the language to ensure we don't impose extraordinary burdens on legitimate companies as long as they aren't the primary purveyors [of pirated content]".

The MPAA's O'Leary submitted written testimony in favor of the bill that expressed guarded support of current DMCA provisions. "Where these sites are legitimate and make good faith efforts to respond to our requests, this model works with varying degrees of effectiveness," O'Leary wrote. "It does not, however, always work quickly, and it is not perfect, but it works."

General threat to web-related businesses

A news analysis in the information technology magazine eWeek stated, "The language of SOPA is so broad, the rules so unconnected to the reality of Internet technology and the penalties so disconnected from the alleged crimes that this bill could effectively kill e-commerce or even normal Internet use. The bill also has grave implications for existing U.S., foreign and international laws and is sure to spend decades in court challenges."

Art Bordsky of advocacy group Public Knowledge similarly stated that "The definitions written in the bill are so broad that any US consumer who uses a website overseas immediately gives the US jurisdiction the power to potentially take action against it."

On October 28, 2011, the EFF called the bill a "massive piece of job-killing Internet regulation," and said, "This bill cannot be fixed; it must be killed."

Gary Shapiro, CEO of the Consumer Electronics Association, spoke out strongly against the bill, stating that "The bill attempts a radical restructuring of the laws governing the Internet," and that "It would undo the legal safe harbors that have allowed a world-leading Internet industry to flourish over the last decade. It would expose legitimate American businesses and innovators to broad and open-ended liability. The result will be more lawsuits, decreased venture capital investment, and fewer new jobs."

Lukas Biewald, founder of CrowdFlower, stated that "It'll have a stifling effect on venture capital... No one would invest because of the legal liability."

Booz & Company on November 16 released a study, funded by Google, finding that almost all of the 200 venture capitalists and angel investors interviewed would stop funding digital media intermediaries if the House bill becomes law. More than 80 percent said they would rather invest in a risky, weak economy with the current laws than a strong economy with the proposed law in effect. If legal ambiguities were removed and good faith provisions in place, investing would increase by nearly 115 percent.

As reported by David Carr of the New York Times in an article critical of SOPA and PIPA, Google, Facebook, Twitter and other companies sent a joint letter to Congress, stating "We support the bills’ stated goals — providing additional enforcement tools to combat foreign ‘rogue’ Web sites that are dedicated to copyright infringement or counterfeiting. However, the bills as drafted would expose law-abiding U.S. Internet and technology companies to new uncertain liabilities, private rights of action and technology mandates that would require monitoring of Web sites.” In response to Carr's article, bill sponsor and Committee Chairman Lamar Smith said the article "unfairly criticizes the Stop Online Piracy Act", and, "does not point to any language in the bill to back up the claims. SOPA targets only foreign Web sites that are primarily dedicated to illegal and infringing activity. Domestic Web sites, like blogs, are not covered by this legislation." Lamar also said that Carr incorrectly framed the debate as between the entertainment industry and high-tech companies, noting support by more than "120 groups and associations across diverse industries, including the United States Chamber of Commerce".

Threat to users uploading content

Lateef Mtima, director of the Institute for Intellectual Property and Social Justice at Howard University School of Law, expressed concern that users who upload copyrighted content to sites such as YouTube could potentially be held criminally liable themselves, saying, "Perhaps the most dangerous aspect of the bill is that the conduct it would criminalize is so poorly defined. While on its face the bill seems to attempt to distinguish between commercial and non-commercial conduct, purportedly criminalizing the former and permitting the latter, in actuality the bill not only fails to accomplish this but, because of its lack of concrete definitions, it potentially criminalizes conduct that is currently permitted under the law."

An aide to bill sponsor Lamar Smith has said, "This bill does not make it a felony for a person to post a video on YouTube of their children singing to a copyrighted song. The bill specifically targets websites dedicated to illegal or infringing activity. Sites that host user content—like YouTube, Facebook, and Twitter—have nothing to be concerned about under this legislation".

Threat to internal networks

A paper by the Center for Democracy and Technology says that the bill "targets an entire website even if only a small portion hosts or links to some infringing content."

According to A. M. Reilly of Industry Leaders Magazine, under SOPA, culpability for distributing copyright material is extended to those who aid the initial poster of said material. For companies that use virtual private networks to create a network that appears to be internal but is spread across various offices and employees' homes, any of these offsite locations that initiate sharing of copyright material can put the entire VPN and hosting company at risk of violation.

Answering similar criticism in a CNET editorial, RIAA head Cary Sherman wrote: "Actually, it's quite the opposite. By focusing on specific sites rather than entire domains, action can be targeted against only the illegal subdomain or Internet protocol address rather than taking action against the entire domain."

Threat to free and open source software

The Electronic Frontier Foundation expressed concern that free and open source software (FLOSS) projects found to be aiding online piracy may experience serious problems under SOPA. Of special concern is the web browser Firefox, made by Open-Source advocate Mozilla, which has a plug-in, MAFIAAFire Redirector, that redirects users to the new location for domains that were seized by the U.S. government. In May 2011, Mozilla refused a request by the Department of Homeland Security to pull MAFIAAFire from its website, asking "Have any courts determined that the Mafiaafire add-on is unlawful or illegal in any way?"

Ineffectual against piracy

Edward J. Black, president and CEO of the Computer & Communication Industry Association, wrote in the Huffington Post that "Ironically, it would do little to stop actual pirate websites, which could simply reappear hours later under a different name, if their numeric web addresses aren't public even sooner. Anyone who knows or has that web address would still be able to reach the offending website."

An editorial in the San Jose Mercury-News stated, "Imagine the resources required to parse through the millions of Google and Facebook offerings every day looking for pirates who, if found, can just toss up another site in no time."

Deep-packet inspection and invasion of privacy

According to Markham Erickson, head of NetCoalition, which opposes SOPA, the section of the bill that would allow judges to order internet service providers to block access to infringing websites to customers located in the United States would also allow the checking of those customers' IP address, a method known as IP blocking. Erickson has expressed concerns that such an order might require those providers to engage in "deep packet inspection", which involves analyzing all of the content being transmitted to and from the user, and may raise new privacy concerns.

Negative impact on DNS, DNSSEC and Internet security

The Domain Name System (DNS) servers, most often equated with a phone directory, translate browser requests for domain names into the IP address assigned to that computer or network. The bill requires these servers to stop referring requests for infringing domains to their assigned IP addresses.

Andrew Lee, CEO of ESET North America, has expressed concerns that since the bill would require internet service providers to filter DNS queries for the sites, this would undermine the integrity of the Domain Name System.

Representative Zoe Lofgren (D-CA), whose district includes part of Silicon Valley, has called the bill "the end of the internet as we know it."

According to David Ulevitch, the San Francisco-based head of OpenDNS, the passage of SOPA could cause Americans to switch to DNS providers located in other countries who offer encrypted links, and may cause U.S. providers, such as OpenDNS itself, to move to other countries, such as the Cayman Islands.

In November 2011, a new anonymous top-level domain, .bit, was launched outside of ICANN control, as a response to the perceived threat from SOPA, although its effectiveness (as well as the effectiveness of other alternative DNS roots) remains unknown.

Internet security

A white paper by several internet security experts, including Steve Crocker and Dan Kaminsky, wrote, "From an operational standpoint, a resolution failure from a nameserver subject to a court order and from a hacked nameserver would be indistinguishable. Users running secure applications have a need to distinguish between policy-based failures and failures caused, for example, by the presence of an attack or a hostile network, or else downgrade attacks would likely be prolific."

DNSSEC

There have been concerns raised that SOPA would harm the usefulness of the Domain Name System Security Extensions (DNSSEC), a set of protocols developed by the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) for ensuring internet security. A white paper by the Brookings Institution wrote that "The DNS system is based on trust," adding that DNSSEC was developed to prevent malicious redirection of DNS traffic, and that "other forms of redirection will break the assurances from this security tool."

On November 17, Sandia National Laboratories, a research agency of the U.S. Department of Energy, released a technical assessment of the DNS filtering provisions in the House and Senate bills, in response to a request from Rep. Lofgren. The assessment stated of both bills that the DNS filtering would be unlikely to be effective, would negatively impact internet security, and would delay full implementation of DNSSEC.

On November 18, House cybersecurity subcommittee chairman Dan Lungren stated that he had "very serious concerns" about SOPA's impact on DNSSEC, adding, "we don't have enough information, and if this is a serious problem as was suggested by some of the technical experts that got in touch with me, we have to address it."

Lack of transparency in enforcement

Brooklyn Law School professor Jason Mazzone warned, "Much of what will happen under SOPA will occur out of the public eye and without the possibility of holding anyone accountable. For when copyright law is made and enforced privately, it is hard for the public to know the shape that the law takes and harder still to complain about its operation."

Who are my congressional representatives and how do I contact them?

Congress needs to hear from all of us or this bill is going to pass. Each representative usually publishes their phone number, email address, or a contact form on their individual official websites. Links to their websites can be found in these directories:

I don't live in the US. What can I do?

The US State Department constantly speaks out against internet censorship in other countries. Pressure them to speak out against America’s new domestic censorship system.

How do I blackout my blog with this template?

Blogger users:
  1. Download a backup of your original Blogger template FIRST!!! If you do not do this, you will not be able to restore your blog.
  2. Download the SOPA Blackout template from here.
  3. Extract the .xml template file from the .zip file.
  4. Upload the SOPA Blackout .xml template at 8am on Jan 18, 2012.
  5. Upload the backup of your original template at 8pm on Jan 18, 2012.
  6. This November, send donations to the competitors of those politicians who voted for SOPA.
Wordpress users:

Credits

Quote of the Week

"The fact of the matter is, you will not see bin Laden walking on this earth again" - Barack Obama, US President

Find Me on Facebook

Find Me on Facebook
I wonder what's in the archive...
Out of Bounds II

After being estranged from my family for more than a decade, I've come home. So, no: it's not a sports blog.


Support Independent Broadcasting!
Showing posts with label lgbt. Show all posts
Showing posts with label lgbt. Show all posts

Friday, April 29, 2011

Speechless: More Thoughts on America's Shame

I guess we should have known that electing a non-white guy to the White House was going to bring out the worst in us. I mean: the 60's weren't that long ago, but I have to admit that I am shocked, stupidly, since for the very same reasons I am stupefied today, I am modulating between anger and depression over every other day as a lesbian woman.

Have we no shame as a nation? I mean I get that it's still funny to laugh at gays and talk about us as if we're a different species or a scourge, but I really thought that at least on national Tee-Vee it wasn't acceptable to give white supremacists a podium to spew their toxic and irrational hate. No one gives the KKK equal time at the microphone to state their case, right? So why do we let Pat Buchanan and Donald Trump onto the air waves? Why is Orly Taitz on a major cable network, even if she was thrown off? I don't know how many times she's been on TV, but I've seen pictures and know it's at least 3 different times.

And this isn't even woman's college basketball. This is the president of the country! Why does anyone feel its acceptable to permit these people to be on TV or to all citizens to purchase billboards questioning the citizenship of the President of the United states? We don't let the Klan buy billboards. We don't let overly graphic images to pollute the psyches of our children as they're being driven to school. So why do we allow this blatant and racist disrespect of the Commander in Chief?

More white people need to speak out--and do so strongly--against this. More white people need to boycott those journalists and their networks that allow this filth to pollute our air waves. You don't have to like Mr. Obama or his policies to show him the proper respect as our president and a fellow American. It's not politics and too many people are allowing it to be a right versus left issue.

Racism is a American problem.

And, no, white lesbians shouldn't wait for the black community to step up and speak out against hetero supremacists and sexism in much larger numbers. As Mahatma Gandhi said, "Be the change you want to see in the world."

That means all of us. MLK Jr's dream was for everyone. So, what are we gonna do about it? Keep fighting our own personal battles or come together and win the war?

New Glory
by Trace Cook

Everyone is a bigot.
Just admit it, and
Grow
Living beings do that
Are you dead? No!
Then today is the time
To start something small
And let it crawl
Until it flies,
Forever young
Flapping free:
You, me:
Our banner still left to wave!

Thursday, April 28, 2011

Allied Apathy

As I tweeted yesterday before bed, yesterday was a sad day for America. First, the sitting president was made to prove his citizenship; then, 9 soldiers were murdered in Afghanistan; next, the Radical Roberts court again handed a major victory to massive corporations, and, finally, the tornadoes.

By the links above you can see that the only thing I didn’t blog about were the soldiers. 

I get very angry and depressed when I think about it, truthfully, so I generally just have to stay away from it like I try to stay away from blogging about hate crimes and sexual assault. There is so much of it that if I let it in, it just consumes me.

Maybe that’s cowardly, but I already have scars on my wrists that prove I’m serious. 

At the end of the day, I’m not ready to die unless I’m dying to defend my own self…because my own self is the only person who has never abandoned me. That’s sad but true—not my mother or father, not my sisters, not my friends or my lovers. Everyone left me or put themselves and their happiness over my best interests from way back when I was a baby, so I refuse to sacrifice myself for anyone now. Should I one day marry, that will change, but until then that’s just the way it is and why, sometimes, I have to just check out and tune out things that bring me down…including my family’s problems and problems with our world. 

Yesterday was one of those days. Today is not. 

You know, when I heard that President Obama had released his birth certificate, I immediately went numb. I knew it was bad that such a thing happened (even though I certainly don’t pretend to have any idea what it is like to be non-white), but I didn’t want to let it in. I didn’t want to believe that we really are that fucked up. 

At lunch, as I was still rapt in horror at the thought. That was when I composed my brief response to the incident, wanting to make a point that I was repulsed without giving the so-called controversy, or that gluttonous asshole with the horrible comb-over, any further publicity. For a while I was satisfied until I went home and was able to log into Twitter. Naomi Klein retweeted something from Van Jones, who was sharing an emotional You Tube video from Baratunde. After watching it, I realized two things:
  1. I’ve become detached from the black community since leaving Michigan 
  2. My silence was bad 
I would like to talk about the world in which I grew up to give this post more perspective, but in doing so I would be biting the hand that feeds me: ergo, sacrificing myself, which I’ve already explained that I’m not willing to do. Once I move out, I will, but, right now, all I can say that it wasn’t my parents who taught me not to be a racist. It was not Jesus, either; although, Jesus did so more than my parents. Mostly, though, it was my fine public education and myself as a free-thinking person who grew up in a diverse, working class neighborhood.

What this post is about is #2. 

Baratunde’s vblog really affected me. As he was talking, I heard myself having the exact same feelings about being female and being gay. And, as much as I wanted to, I knew that I could not fully appreciate his pain, just like he can’t fully appreciate mine as a lesbian woman.

I think what has to be hard for Black Americans at this time is the silence of much of white America who doesn’t give a shit about the president’s birth certificate. I understand that because it’s exactly how I feel about much of straight America who doesn’t give a shit about someone else’s sex life or desire to be married. They won’t spit on me or try to kill me or even vote against me, but they won’t speak up or do anything to help me because they can’t identify with me.

The world will be a better place when we all only identify as part of the human race. Obviously, we still have a long ways to go, but since I do understand the frustration of allied apathy, this is me not being silent. And this is me promising to start speaking out about this disgusting disrespect for the president and to make sure that I do not unintentionally support any of the racists still pushing this, including journalists.

Oh, and if you didn’t see Maddow last night, this part, especially, was worth a look:


No, podcasting an uber smart and geeky cutie like Rachel is not the same was watching TV. A single woman living at home to save money has got to get her lady-lovin' jollies somehow. Peace.

Tuesday, April 26, 2011

Robertson: Behold the Path for Lesbian Equality

I try never to make it a habit to quote Pat Robertson, but this nugget of anti-logic (think anti-matter) is far too good to pass up.

Apparently, according to The Advocate magazine, the certifiably stupid Mr. Robertson unveiled the secret reason why liberals support a woman's right to make her own medical decisions last night on his television program for lunatics...because...wait for it...promoting choice leads to childless straight women which, in turn, puts the second-class lesbian on equal footing because everyone knows that lesbians can't and don't have children, fool. O_o

Yes, queer as folks, you heard the man right. The liberals who gave us DADT and DOMA are pro-choice because they want us barren butches to be empowered in our childlessness.

And on the Seventh Day the Lord rested. Wow. Now, I wonder why I didn't see that when it's so plainly obviously--like the hair on a frog...

STUPID. Find the cure...fast.

Monday, April 25, 2011

More Bigotry from Bigots

Is anyone surprised that the Prop 8 proponents, who claim that they are not bigots and that they are only trying to protect the sanctity of marriage, are now trying to get the trial decision tossed out because, as it turns out, the judge who ruled that putting civil rights up to a majority vote was unconstitutional, was involved in a long-lived same-sex relationship? I'm probably offending someone by saying this, but anyone who thinks these people don't want to push me back into a closet and then out the bottom in into a grave is a fool.

Of course it's about homophobia, hatred, and bigotry. Of course it's prejudice and discrimination no different than Jim Crow era segregation, and this motion should obliterate the remaining doubt for the doubters. Here's why:

Do we throw out decisions by female judges who rule on gender discrimination against women? No. Why not? Because the only other option is a male judge, who is equally likely to be just as biased. This isn't Star Trek; we can't beam up our androgynous alien friends or ask the Vulcans to take the gavel. We have to make due with what we have and focus on the rule of law using simple, straight-forward, impartial logic...like the Vulcans. Anything else is prejudice and that's why Lady Justice is blindfolded, because she is not prejudice.

Of course, there are plenty of times when judges do recuse themselves, as they should, but those are always circumstances where the potential bias is something that is unique to them...meaning someone else, just like them, can step in because they don't have stock in some company or they aren't related to so and so. Discrimination is always against one thing versus another: there are two camps and everyone exists in one of them. No one side is better or worse at being impartial, and the very notion that a gay judge can't rule on a case of a whole lot of straight people oppressing a much smaller number of gay people is pure, unadulterated bigotry. Sadly many American, gay, straight, and bisexual, suffer from hetero-elitism.

The good news is that once you're aware of it, you can change it. Like any process, the first step is admitting that you have a problem.

Look at the clock below. Think about it.

Sunday, April 24, 2011

Live and Let Live, Remember?

Mary Ann Evans Cross, noted for her written works under the pseudonym of George Eliot, once said: "It's never too late to be what you might have been." It's one of my favorite quotes because I always infer an assumption of self-manifested destiny into it--of free will, not fate..because, otherwise, what's the point of it? If it's fate and there is no free will, then what's the purpose of encouraging someone to step forward, reach, and make a change? There is none.

I bring this up because Kelly McGillis is making headlines today because she doesn't want to be a LGBT role model. *gasp!* The actress, famous for her roles in Top Gun, The Accused, and Witness, who was once the victim of a violent assault long before she came out as lesbian about 2 years ago, was quoted in On Top Magazine as saying, 
"I would like to be seen as a human being doing the best I can with what I've been given, and as someone who muddled through somehow and didn't kill anybody."
Gee, that sounds more than a little familiar...

For the record, as a lesbian who grew up watching and swooning over Ms. McGillis and her big bones, all I can say is that I wish her nothing but the best. By going forth and living her life to the best of her abilities, out of the closet, she is, whether she realizes it or not, a role model for every human being...because it's not about being gay or even the daily struggle of being gay. It's about being human and surviving life's harsh realities without succumbing to the ills on full display in any newspaper in the world.

It may not be convenient for the Human Rights Campaign crowd and their A-list donors for Ms. McGillis to refuse to be used as the latest pin-up, but as Bonnie Raitt sings, "What is living if you can't be free; what is freedom if I can't be me?"

Ms. McGillis doesn't owe anyone anything: she came out. Let the lady enjoy her life and be your own role model. It's 2011 and we have You Tube, not to mention free will. It's never too late to be what you might have been...

Used to being Discounted

Last night before bed I was reading the story about the NY Maternity store that is offering a 10% discount to lesbian couples. I saw the story on the OOB2 news ticker above and wanted to read something nice before bed. Of course, that was a mistake because, OF COURSE, it's a big story. I didn't realize that until I started to read the comments. Of the 20 or so that there were on the local news website, every single one of them was negative.

Something was bothering me about the logic of the commenters, but after a long day I couldn't think of it. This Easter morning it struck me while I was adding some rare make-up to my face before we headed out to my aunt's: every time I go out with my dad he gets a discount for being a senior...for the same reasons this shop owner is offering a hardship discount to female-only couples: they typically have less money. See, I knew it would come to me...just needed some sleep to recharge the noggin'.

I challenge anyone, anywhere to tell me how offering a hardship to lesbian couples is different.

Friday, April 22, 2011

Up is Down

Iowa GOP asshats introduced legislation to impeach state supreme court justices for making a decision they didn't like--for deciding a constitutional matter...for deciding, unanimously, that restricting same-sex couples from the right to marry is unconstitutional.

George Bush lies to Congress and the American people during the State of the Union, sending our country to war. He authorizes outing a covert CIA agent for political payback against her husband. He authorizes torture and warrant-less wire-tapping of American citizens, but because he gave rich people money and didn't want gay people to get married he's OK. But these justices, they should be impeached!

I'm perfectly comfortable with the judges being defeated in an election because of their decision. That's democracy. I don't agree with the people of Iowa who sacked them, but I also know that those people won't live forever and history is on my side. I may not live to see it or still be young enough to enjoy it, but that doesn't matter.

Impeaching judges for making a decision you don't like is another matter. Like Washington D.C., the Iowa GOP is stuck on STUPID. Find the cure.

Wednesday, April 20, 2011

Duh!

For the last week on the Twitter and even on the little news ticker on this blog I've seen varied forms of the statement that LGBTIQ youth have lower suicide rates in a supportive environment.

Tell me this is not news! How fucking stupid and homophobic are we for fuck's sake? Of course suicide risk is lower in a supportive environment. Why else would we kill ourselves in not for all the fuckers who make our lives utterly hellish with no mercy in sight?

STUPID. Find the cure.

Monday, April 18, 2011

John Boehner: Justice Department Should Pay House GOP To Uphold Defense Of Marriage Act


Since this is such a high moral issue that affects the very foundation of our society, I'm sure that Mr. Boehner could find someone to work such a high-profi­le Federal case pro bono. Right?

What would Jesus do?
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Saturday, May 29, 2010

Melissa Etheridge - Fearless Love?

I love that feature of Twitter that tells you about new things. Would you believe I never knew about Blip? I would. Anyway, thare be my channel, mateys! http://blip.fm/tracecook

My first blip? Melissa Etheridge's "Fearless Love"...even though, I have to admit, that I've been feeling down on M.E. since news broke of she and Tammy's break up. I've wanted to blog about it, but I also didn't because it's so not my business--tonight it struck me.


When I heard about the split, I literally couldn't believe it. Why? I don't know, but I couldn't imagine Tammy leaving "Honey" and after what M.E. went through with Julie, I couldn't imagine her walking away from that dreamy thing like the movies--"tank top, smooth skin, sunned lips, tan thighs." I mean "Secret Agent" alone, which I saw live before it ever came out on Lucky was enough to tell me that Missy was around the bend and never comin' back with the cows.

I immediately went to Tammy's blog. I've been following it steadily for a few years, not because she's married to a famous artist I like or because she was on TV, by the way--I'm not a groupie-type and I still don't watch TV--but because she's a poet/writer with actual talent whose point of view I understand as we're similar in age, prefer the mid-west, and think California is the moral/societal equivalent of Chernobyl.

Okay...that sounds incredulous, even if it's not. But it kind of is, too. Here's the whole truth: because my ex, Diane, (the one who feels like an ex because I can lament and miss her) is about Melissa's age and knows her from way back on the scene in Omaha; she also worked in the music industry. True. It was funny to us, Di and me, when they hooked up and got all that press--I guess we felt a little like kindered spirits from far away in Michigan, but that was already the second time around for us. As much as I loved her, and always will, truthfully, as least the parts that used to make me smile like mad money, I wasn't mature enough to understand the problems she had with depression as I had not had them myself to that degree. The first time we broke up was not my fault, but the second time was...so that's why I follow Tammy and why I care that they split and why I need to write a bout it...even though I recognize it's none of my business.

It's not them I'm writing about; it's me.

So, I shouldn't judge. I really like them both; I want them both to be happy...because, if they can be, then maybe I can be...somewhere my fearless love can't stop the wanting, either.

Wednesday, July 29, 2009

Bombs Allegedly Hurled at Gay Athletes from Church

Why does that not surprise me?

Did you even know that the Out Games were happening in Coppenhagen Denmark? Odds are that you didn't. But did you know that three IEDs were thrown onto the track during them, injuring one of the althetes yesterday?

Odds are: you still didn't know.

A swimmer splits his suit, revealing his bum and the whole world hears about it and sees the photos, but violent hate crimes happen during a sporting event and all you hear is crickets. Just sayin'.

It is relevant to the US national discussion, though: the Matthew Shepard Act just recently passed the Senate and needs only now the President's signature. This is a perfect example of why hate crimes legislation is needed...because these bombers who, apparently, threw the explosive devices from a nearby church while shouting "Homo pig" weren't just trying to hurt the contestants: they were trying to terrorize the entire LBGTQI community and it wasn't until after the second bombing that the police even showed up.

If the neighbor next door kills his wife because he hates her, that does not terrorize an entire community; that event, while disturbing and shocking like all violence (should be), stands on its own as between the perpetrator and the victim. Whereas when someone beats a man for holding his brother's hand while shouting anti-gay slurs, that affects everyone who is gay or who, like that man, may be preceived (falsely) as being gay just from showing affection to someone of the same biological sex.

Doubly, what is one supposed to do if local law enforcement is involved in said crime or totally complicit? I'm seeing things nearly every day in the paper about cops telling people to leave restaurants and such because their PDA was "illegal" and they could be arrested for "homosexual conduct" or "trespassing"...or what about that raid in San Antonio on the Stonewall anniversary when someone got their head bashed in? What about the rate of murders perpetrated on transgender citizens? What about the protesters who go to the funerals of soldiers and hold signs that read "God Hates Fags" and others that go to Pride Events and hold signs that read "Death to Fags"?

I realize there is a lot more wrong with the world than this, but how are we to fix it if we don't even acknowledge it? Surely an athlete bleeding because of a bomb (an act of terrorism) is more newsworthy than an althete with a wardrobe malfunction...even though he does have a very nice butt.

Thursday, July 16, 2009

Red Sky Morning Night

A sailor's delight...

Her name is Carrie.

I could start from the beginning and all of that, but I don't care to because no one reads this anyway--and why should they? I'm horrible at keeping it updated. Sorr [sic].

I don't know if Carrie and I are soulmates; I don't know if we are crazy bitches and gluttons for punishment. I don't know??? What I do know is that, for now, she is the one that got away...and the one, still, I wish... Well, I don't know what I wish anymore.

I will never delete her contact information. I will never hate her or even think negatively of her...even though I might spout my frustration. It was only ever sadness...pure sadness that it never happened.

She and I have come in and out of communication with each other for about 6 years now; originally it was my fault because I was involved with someone when we met, the last times of disconnect have been her.

It started with a simple comment I made on her blog, having no idea she was attracted to women. She talked, only good things, about her husband and her kids on the blog. She was talking about her struggles with her self-image, obsessing over every little pound, now that she'd lost an impressive amount of weight. I simply told her to throw the scale out the window and go by how her clothes are fitting; scales are evil...and I still believe this, even though I do get one them from time to time.

She wrote back, calling me her angel and that was just the comment she needed. The next day, I got a message from her. She'd read my blog, saw that I was a HOMO, and decided that she wanted to ask me some questions. Innocent enough: sure, I can play big gay sister. :) *sigh*

6 years later...

I recently got Office 2k7. Last night I finally decided that I was going to use this suite for all it's worth and I started the process of cleaning up the disaster area that was my email. I get so much and since I moved to California, I'm just not on the computer that much. I know people have emailed me but it's a mass of crap that I don't even pay attention to anymore unless I'm expecting something. Ok--so had to fix that. Done.

Then, now that I had my contacts all cleaned up, I went over to Facebook to say hi to my neglected peeps while I was online. Then I see that she is suggested as a friend. No picture available, but I know it's her: her handle is as unique as she is beautiful. Did I mention she was gorgeous? Oh--forgot that. I'm my eyes, she's as splendid (and dangerous) as a red sky in the morning. Her looks; her voice; her attitude: her charm: Perfection (by my definition, which is anything but fake or flawless).

I considered it for a minute and then said "screw it" and clicked the link to add her as a friend. After that I forgot about it, honestly--haven't heard from her since Dec. '07 so it was in and out of my mind. I went to bed, went to work, 12 hours later I came home, did my 30 minute workout in the pool (the one nice thing about CA) and finally sat down to check my email w/ Outlook...everything all nice and neat, very pretty, and then there are 2 emails from Carrie.

First @ 7:30am:

(username) sent you a message.
--------------------

(no subject)


I don't have your email address...seems so sterile to send a msg through FB...

I made a promise to you that I intend to keep.

With warm regards,
C
--------------------


I can't recall what she promised me. Damn.


Second @ 2:00pm:
(username) sent you a message.
--------------------
Subject: argh...

why did you do this to me?
#@%*,
C
--------------------


You know, I asked myself why I did this to me, too--I am recovering from a major depressive episode late last year and sending Feb. 2, 2009 when I called home after not being dead. And then it occurred to me, the same way it feels to me right now: It's no longer traumatic for me; at least, it doesn't feel that way as I write this. And why am I writing this--because I'm tried of not documenting what is, for better or worse, a love story: my story. Why I've done that I'll keep to myself, but I'm sure, if she knew, she would understand.

The truth is that I still would like to see her when I go to Chicago in August. I still would like to take her for a drink and debate the riddles of the universe; maybe kiss her lips, once--never have. Just to know. The unknowing is the hardest part. But I'm in a different place now--more zen; less deprived. She no longer feels ominous; yet, I would be lying if I said that I don't have any hopes to one day call her mine. Until then I'll just keep them at bay and think of her as the one that got away.

Editor's Note: After posting this, I realized that the point I was trying to make wasn't really made with the original title. This one fits.

Dangerous
by Michael Jackson

The way she came into the place
I knew right then and there
There was something different
About this girl
The way she moved
Her hair, her face, her lines
Divinity in motion

As she stalked the room
I could feel the aura
Of her presence
Every head turned
Feeling passion and lust

The girl was persuasive

The girl I could not trust

The girl was bad
The girl was dangerous

I never knew but I was
Walking the line
Come go with me
I said I have no time
She said don't you pretend we didn't
Talk on the phone
My baby cried
And left me standing alone

She's so dangerous
The girl is dangerous
Take away my money
Throw away my time
You can call me honey
But you're no damn good for me

Wednesday, June 3, 2009

Call to Action: KRXQ Radio Hosts Rob Williams and Arnie States Advocate Abuse and Violence Against Transgender Children


Issue:
On May 28, 2009, listeners of Rob, Arnie & Dawn in the Morning were treated to a 30+ minute segment in which hosts Rob Williams and Arnie States, responding to a recent story about the supportive parents of a gender-transitioning child, advocated abuse and violence against the transgender community, specifically children. The show is heard in Sacramento, California on KRXQ 98.5FM and in Reno, Nevada on KDOT 104.5FM.

While co-host Dawn expressed her disillusionment and eventually apology for Rob and Arnie’s grotesque statements, some in which these so-called men referred to transgender children as “idiots”, “freaks”, and “animals”, the vile temerity of the male hosts was not assailed.

You can read more and even listen to the segment at GLAAD’s site: http://www.glaad.org/Page.aspx?pid=730

Reaction:
Living in So-Cal, I did not hear this show. Yet after just 3 months in this state I have to say: I am not surprised. Liberal Mecca my ass. This state is a bastion of hate and self-righteous greedy hypocrites.

Regarding Rob and Arnie: I know these people have only a scintilla of the celebrity of Don Imus, but advocating violence against children? On the air? Seriously, where is the FCC? I think this is a wee bit more detrimental to society and children than fleeting expletives, Janet Jackson’s breast, or my desire to one day have a wife.

Will this reach CNN or the front page of the LA Times? Doubtful (and not as of yet), but it’s only bat-shit crazy drag queens we’re talking about. Right? Did you know (according to the Human Rights Campaign) that transgender persons living in American (this country!) have a 1 in 12 chance of being MURDERED?

We (well, the few of us that know about it) rail about how gays in Iraq (over 600 now) are being rounded up and summarily executed by their families, communities, Iranian death squads responding to a death-to-gays fatwa, and now by the government, too, in the “worst, more severe way of killing” but why isn’t anyone talking about the brutal murders that are happening in this country in which few arrests are being made? One in 12? That’s only twice as good as your chances in Russian Roulette!

And so it begins…

Last Tuesday I reached my tipping point.

I don’t care how much of my time it takes. I don’t care if it costs me all of my money. I don’t care if it, once again, makes me an outcast and I gain the label of “evil woman” like Nancy Pelosi has for some reason from my aunt.

I.Will.No.Longer.Sit.Quietly.Trying.To.Make.You.Comfortable.

Screw you and your values. Oddly enough, I think you’re immoral, too.

No more Mrs. Nice Gay. Fire it up and pass it on.

Friday, February 27, 2009

"Like I could resist this photo op!"


I talked to K. She said what I felt in my head but what I needed someone else to say. In the end it just makes me sad for my sister who believes that Jesus believes in discrimination and oppression (pictured here on the right...the one with her face smudged out). This was apparently Halloween 2008. The caption reads "Like I could resist this photo op." There were 4 similar pictures of this "marriage defender."


Propping up Prop 8. I think my sister is supposed to be a cheerleader. Hooray!

Wednesday, February 25, 2009

Talkie


My dad came over today; he's a motorcyclist. We had a nice visit and managed to do some talking...about work, economics, the president’s speech, K. I’m not complaining; he was talkative and my mother’s husband decided not to come home last night so he worked from home today ergo: we weren’t alone and had to sit outside in the rather chilly air in order to visit. He stayed for about 2 ½ hours. As he left he promised to call K and offer his support. He was sweet.
After that I hopped online. J accepted me as her friend and wrote “hey. Welcome back =)” on my wall. I checked out her profile and found that she supports a “defend marriage in CA” group…or, in other words, a destroy/prevent same-sex relationship group. What love—yet I’m the single-minded obstinate one according to my mom because it’ll be me who decides whether or not to have a relationship with them. Oh gawd.
I realize that I have been extremely lucky. In Michigan, the last 10 years since I came out, my sexual orientation has never once been an issue of even debate…or, if it was, it was never apparent to me. It just wasn’t, but no one there was my family. Every one else from bosses to friends just didn’t care. There was one incident on a train from A2 to Royal Oak where a young and poorly reared preteen was bouncing around the aisle yelling “queers!” when she saw me and my ex sitting together and I was resting my head on her shoulder. That’s it.
So, maybe I lack tolerance for intolerance, hate, and hypocrisy? Is it worth me tolerating their intolerance, hate, and hypocrisy? I’m not sure; we’ll see how often it occurs in my family.
I sent K a text message. She works 3rd shift in SC. I asked her to call me on her break tonight or tomorrow. I need some big sister advice. Stay tuned.

OOB2 Files

activism (2) amazing (1) art (10) awards (1) birthday (1) blog (7) books (1) california (6) career (4) carrie (3) charity (1) comedy (1) commentary (32) confessions (1) democracy now (2) diet (3) doma (1) election (1) family (11) feminism (1) financial (6) fitness (2) flower (4) food (4) friends (1) gadgets (1) gaming (1) gas (2) green (3) h8 (5) health (2) history (1) holiday (1) iowa (1) iPad (1) iPhone (1) iPod (8) israel (1) koch bros (1) la times (1) lgbt (16) libya (3) lost (2) love (2) Mac (1) michigan (2) movie (2) music (4) new york (1) news (23) nukes (1) obama (14) OBL (6) oil spill (2) organic (1) poetry (1) politics (15) product review (7) Prop 8 (3) racism (3) radio (2) recession (2) religion (3) scotus (2) snarky (1) social media (3) sports (1) stupid (5) suicide (2) syria (1) taxes (1) technology (5) tv (5) union (1) vegetarian (1) video (3) war (3) wealth (2) weather (1) wikileaks (4) work (2)

Hire Me

Blip.fm

Twitter

This Much Oil Doesn't Just Vanish!

Since learning of the killing of Osama bin Laden, my overall approval of Pres. Obama has...

Subscribe via email

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Powered by Blogger.

Popular Posts

About Me

My photo
Corona, CA, United States
How can one chick be so different than her family when she has 3 sisters? I don't know, but I am. Explore more below to find out how. I'll let you decide why.